Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:01

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
European Mars orbiter spies crumbling crater 'soaked in layers of Martian history' (photo) - Space
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Iusto et ipsum nesciunt est qui.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Don't miss the crescent moon shining close to Mars on May 31 - Space
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
‘Borderlands 4’ Is Now My Most-Anticipated Game Of The Year - Forbes
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.